If the outcome makes them feel bad in any way, they can search for any proof that would discredit it and, thus, make them feel better.ģ. The thing is that people often pick sides of an argument based on the outcomes rather than the evidence. Search for Any Biased Opinions in the Article Another step is to evaluate the piece based on the presence of biased opinions. This issue typically occurs when someone believes the given information is true because it makes them feel good.Ģ.
Now, when you have an idea about which way you should be heading in your critique paper, it is the time to start gathering evidence. The first step will help you read and understand the piece, look at it from a critical point of view, and reflect upon it.
Is the conclusion clear and logical? Did the author arrive at a clear outcome in his or her work? What are the logical fallacies in the author’s viewpoint? Are there any logical blindspots? How much do they affect the outcome?Ħ. Are the arguments presented valid? Are the sources used by the author from all over the place? Does it seem like some sources are taken from places that share a cult-like vocabulary?ĥ. Who is the article’s target audience? Is the article geared towards a general audience? Or does it appeal to a specific group of people and use language that is only understandable to that audience?Ĥ. What is the author’s thesis/hypothesis? What is the main message the author is trying to convey? Is this message clear? Or are there just plenty of general phrases without any specific details?ģ. Why is the article’s author considered an expert in their field? What makes a particular author’s opinion sound valid? Is the author knowledgeable about the topic? What do other field experts say about the author? Is the article’s author covered in academic praise or not taken seriously?Ģ. Next, you need to address the following questions:ġ. For a better outcome, it is recommended to read the piece several times-until you fully understand the information presented in it. Although the purpose is similar, the structure of the article critique that we are going to address in this guide is slightly different from the standard 5-paragraph essay however, both formats are suitable for convincing readers about the validity of your point of view.įirst of all, to critique the article, you need to read it carefully. Before we move on, it is worth noting that the main purpose of a good article critique is to bring up points that determine whether a reviewed article is either correct or incorrect-much like you would do while writing a persuasive essay.
#Article critique apa format example how to#
How to write a critique paper – In this guide, we are going to take you through the process of writing this type of work step by step. Thus, the only ways to distinguish solid arguments from weak ones are to be a good researcher, have the right tools to pick out facts from fiction, and possess solid critical thinking skills. The task of every author of a research article is to convince readers of the correctness of his or her viewpoint, even if it is skewed. The key to success in writing this paper is critical thinking. Simply put, a critique reflects upon the validity and effectiveness of the arguments the article’s author used in his or her work. The key task is to identify the strong and weak sides of the piece and assess how well the author interprets its sources. An article critique is an assignment that requires a student to critically read a research article and reflect upon it.
0 kommentar(er)
